<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How LogStore Digitial Signatures will Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logtools.org/logstore-digital-signatures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logtools.org/logstore-digital-signatures/</link>
	<description>Useful tools for syslog and text logs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:07:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rgerhards</title>
		<link>http://www.logtools.org/logstore-digital-signatures/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>rgerhards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logtools.org/?p=16#comment-7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The signed timestamp actually makes a lot of sense. Please also have a look at the comment of on my blog announcement:

http://blog.gerhards.net/2011/12/feedback-request-for-digitally-signed.html

I guess this pretty much boils down to the same issue. I will wait for more input, probably until mid-January, and then see what to implement and in which order.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The signed timestamp actually makes a lot of sense. Please also have a look at the comment of on my blog announcement:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.gerhards.net/2011/12/feedback-request-for-digitally-signed.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.gerhards.net/2011/12/feedback-request-for-digitally-signed.html</a></p>
<p>I guess this pretty much boils down to the same issue. I will wait for more input, probably until mid-January, and then see what to implement and in which order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.logtools.org/logstore-digital-signatures/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 17:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logtools.org/?p=16#comment-6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thought: I think the external hash is one way to prevent/detect a rewriting. Another way is to include a signed timestamp (i.e. from an external timestamp server) into a log partition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thought: I think the external hash is one way to prevent/detect a rewriting. Another way is to include a signed timestamp (i.e. from an external timestamp server) into a log partition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
